Podium Presentation Title: Remplissage Reduces Risk of Recurrent Instability vs. Bankart Repair Alone at Medium-Term Follow-Up

The aim of this study was to compare the medium-term outcomes patients randomized arthroscopic Bankart repair with (REMP) and without remplissage (NO REMP) for treatment traumatic recurrent shoulder instability Hill-Sachs lesions. At 2-year postoperative, those were found be at greater risk instability. In current study, these rates are reexamined a mean 4-years postoperative. This double-blinded trial REMP or NO between 2011 2017. Patients contacted in Spring 2020 by telephone asked standardized questions regarding subluxation, dislocation and/or reoperation that occurred on their shoulder. “Failure” defined as occurrence "recurrent instability” two more subluxations. One-hundred eight participants which 50 group 52 included. number months from surgery final follow-up 49.3 53.8 REMP. rate failure 8% (4/52) an average 23.8 post-operative 22% (11/50) 16.5 (p=0.036) (Figure 1). 10% (5/52) 24 versus 30% (15/50) 19.5 (p=0.008). Survival curves significantly different favoring both scenarios. There is less postoperative who undergo conjunction compared alone follow-up.